Bronteana: Bronte Studies Blog Archives

May 25, 2006


Filed under: Uncategorized — by bronteana @ 12:11 am

Lowood Libel?

Splashed all over google news today is the auctioning of letters supposedly revealing a previously unknown court action only barely avoided by Charlotte Brontë. The letters, written in 1912 (when Miss Brontë had long ago been laid to rest), suggest that Charlotte wrote an apology for her depiction of Rev. Carus Wilson as Mr Brocklehurst, confessing to exaggerating the conditions at the school, and re-writing part of Jane Eyre. The ‘apology’ has never been seen, although the reverend apparently sold it to pay for medical treatment.

It appears that court action was only avoided when Bronte wrote an apology, pointing out that she had exaggerated the details.
The story of the dispute is disclosed in three letters by Mr Carus-Wilson’s grandson, Edward Carus-Wilson, which have been put up for auction by an anonymous London book dealer and are due to be sold at Ludlow racecourse on June 21.
The letters were written in 1912 when Mr Carus-Wilson sold the manuscript of Bronte’s retraction to an autograph collector to pay for his child’s medical treatment.
Richard Westwood-Brookes, a documents expert for the auctioneers Mullock Madeley, in Shropshire, who decided to investigate the contents of the letters further, said: “The Bronte experts at the Parsonage Museum in Haworth were unaware of any kerfuffle involving Jane Eyre at the time it was published.”

It seems very strange to me, especially since these articles claim that no one knew that there was any controversy over the Lowood passages of the novel. If I knew about it, I am sure others did. In fact, many of the books written about the Brontes cover the furor that errupted over the depictions of Lowood. Even after Charlotte’s death, there were constant wrangling over it in the public press, even involving Charlotte’s husband who broke his silence to defend his wife’s depictions with perhaps too much passion. It is true that I’ve never heard of this crucial piece of evidence being presented- which begs the question of why it wasn’t brought up at the time. It also seems quite out of character for Charlotte to choose to retract something she has written, when she was so often passionate about the truth of her depictions taken from her own experience.

Image is of the Rev. Carus Wilson.



  1. The contents of this news story does not seem well-researched.

    I have two questions for the writer of this article:
    1. Why should this issue come up in the news now? As in what other factors might have contributed to the auctioning of the letters?

    2. Why are the letters sold for only 100 pounds?

    Comment by mysticgypsy — May 26, 2006 @ 2:18 am |Reply

  2. No. And there are a lot of other probability issues, not the least of which is why it was never made public during the scandal over the depiction of the Rev and the school.

    Comment by Brontëana — May 26, 2006 @ 2:36 pm |Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: